Quote:
|
But honestly, there have been just as many horrible decisions in UDRP disputes in recent history as there have been INDRP cases. We don't say .com is worthless because the UDRP process doesn't seem consider the rights of domain holders and names are being ripped from .com domain owners in frightening numbers.
|
Tell me again - what is the response period under the INDRP?
Go read it. When you have a factual basis for a statement, feel free to post it here.
In the rig.in dispute, several days after the complainant filed the complaint, the arbitrator set the response period to seven days
from the time it was filed. In other words, the response period was expired by the time the respondent knew what the response period was.
Protecting their marks? Really? The complainant in rig.in has rig.co.in. What do they use it for? It is a parking page. Their mark, by the way is not "RIG".
Please, I'm willing to bet you have no practical experience with the UDRP, so unless you want to demonstrate otherwise, don't lecture me about it. I have direct experience with both systems, and the INDRP is a sham, and the .in ccTLD is worthless.