|
![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Status: Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 13
|
Which is better?
I have seen a bunch of solid available for .co.in and sometimes the .in is already gone. What do you guys think is the better of the two extensions? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) |
|
Status: Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 34
|
.in has better resell value and domainers target this one first.
co.in appears to have better type in traffic. A lot of the heavy hitters (google etc) use co.in. However, ebay uses .in. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Status: Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 27
|
My opinion FWIW is that inevitably .in will replace .co.in Why type three extra strokes when a simpler form is available? In linguistics it's called Zipf's Law. Shorter usually replaces longer.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|